THE GUARDIAN BOOKS PODCAST, April 10th, 2013:
"Cardiac death, also called clinical death, is not true death. Here's why":
==> DOWNLOAD AUDIO FILE
[Audio files on this blog are Windows files ; if you have a Mac, you might want to use VLC (http://www.videolan.org) to read them.]
Or go here:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/audio/2013/apr/10/books-podcast-offer-audio-edition
Set the progress bar (of the podcast's audio file) to 38:20... and start listenting!
"The Lazarus Effect: The Science That is Rewriting the Boundaries Between Life and Death", by
Sam Parnia, MD.
==> Buy that book on Amazon.
Book review on Amazon: "I bought the book after reading an article in a journal on Dr Parnia's
work. I therefore had a fair idea of what to expect. The science of
resuscitation seems to have made significant advances in the last
decade, but what I found disturbing is that those advances are not
uniformly available even within the same hospital emergency unit because
of significant variances between the training and motivation of the
staff on duty at any particular time.
I also find it disturbing
that the blurring of the divide between life and death has not been
accompanied by a recognition that harvesting organs from a body just
because the heart has ceased to beat and the pupils are dilated might
well amount to causing unlawful death in some instances. Doctors
motivated by the health of a transplant patient may be circumspect about
disclosing the full potential of recent advances in the science of
resuscitation to the loved ones of a prospective donor. These were not
matters directly canvassed by Dr Parnia, although he does acknowledge
the variances of health care within the same hospital.
I was a
bit disappointed at his work on near death experiences. While he
outlines efforts to explore the phenomenon, those efforts appear to have
been inconclusive to date. Perhaps this is fertile ground for a
sequel, but any research that definitively addresses this question will
no doubt become public knowledge well in advance of any book as that
kind of research will be of interest to all.
A good book should
prompt thought on the part of the reader. Dr Parnia has most certainly
done that. But he has also provided an interesting and illuminating
read about a topic that we will all need to address at some time in our
lives, if only at the very end -whenever and whatever that is."(Source).
Très intéressant topo, à mon avis. Quelques questions qui restent à voir néanmoins. Le Dr Parnia dit qu'il peut supprimer les conséquences de l’arrêt cardiaque mais ça ne dit pas concrètement (étude de cas):
RépondreSupprimer1) comment il répare la cause de l’arrêt cardiaque (ben ça risque de recommencer sinon)
2) comment ils peuvent savoir que le cerveau n'a pas été endommagé (dommages réversibles : cette notion doit être bien expliquée et documentée, car elle va à l'inverse de ce qui est rabâché depuis les années 70 !)
Je suppose que c'est parce que le toubib en question est spécialiste en réa et que donc il ne parle que pour sa partie technique... son tronçon ... Mais cela manque de transversal ou de vue d'ensemble et ressemble donc (pour peu que je me fasse l'avocat du diable) à une petite querelle de spécialistes qui ne casse pas 3 pattes a un canard...