it's creepy! “@jrovner: w/ Legos! RT: @sarahkliff 9 mind-blowing facts about the dysfunction of American health care
http://t.co/iI7ESPk5Oz”
— Farzad Mostashari (@Farzad_MD) September 26, 2014
9 mind-blowing facts about the dysfunction of American health care, with Legos!
"Biologists find an early sign of cancer"
"Elevation in leucine+isoleucine+valine levels in blood: predicting pancreatic cancer diagnosis 1 -10 yrs in advance" http://t.co/ZwzMnJLTMh
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 29, 2014
"A Brief History of Humankind" by Yuval Noah Harari
https://www.coursera.org/course/humankind
BANKSY
"A Brief History of Humankind" http://t.co/5ShtaKUyOs @coursera as provocative as @banksyny #CDoM #ASGH14 @geochurch pic.twitter.com/INyn4PODtP
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 30, 2014
The World In 3013
Working on US version of this book (the world in 3013) w/ Fr. co-writer @cp92isa. Special thx 2 @techreview & #ASHG14 pic.twitter.com/tqaBF4LoRH
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 24, 2014
With all this momentum in genome editing http://t.co/kX7jJIiU7Z I'm thinking this could even be true someday :-) pic.twitter.com/YvAbuQk7Al
— Eric Topol (@EricTopol) September 25, 2014
Feng Zhang, genome engin. lab, MIT: "biology is a programmable system, we just need 2 figure out the instruction set" http://t.co/Cyyz9tvka8
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 26, 2014
My Questions On DRM
DRM (Digital Rights Management):
1. Are DRM protections actually adding or substracting value to a product?
NB: value in use not the same thing as market value!
DRM cause the market value of a product to be higher while value in use will be lower:
What happens is: you buy a product with DRM at a higher price; but DRM are here to put limits to the use you can make of it -> lower value in use.
How would I like this as a client/consumer/customer? Not so much.
How would I like this as a conglomerate? Probably a lot, wink wink.
2. Do DRM raise the cost of products? Do they raise the value in use (can you do more things with the product you bought)?
3. Are DRM paradoxical?
Yes, if they always raise the cost of products and never raise the value in use. Otherwise, no.
4. Cory Doctorow (@doctorow) -- boingboing -- wrote: "DRM fails completely at preventing copying, but it is brilliant at preventing innovation". Is Cory right? (oops, almost wrote: is copy right, lol)
(source of quotation:http://www.theguardian.com/technology/blog/2013/mar/12/tim-berners-lee-drm-cory-doctorow)
5. More and more products are including a software. Does this mean the end of property?
Copyrighted softwares have become the frequent case scenario, there are more and more of them, so when a consumer buys a product, he is not the owner of the software included in the product he bought. This is the case for a whole range of products, TV, car, watch...
6. Because of copyrighted softwares included in the products we buy, will we become tenants/renters/occupants instead of owners/proprietors? (end of property?) Will we rent a product instead of buying it? Is that even a problem, by the way? I'd be curious to know what people have to say here.
7. Can you give examples of DRM being beneficial or detrimental to you, in your personal or professional life?
DRM are here to protect IP (intellectual property). Of course IP is a *vast* topic...
Found it this morning, on Cory's twitter account: "Doctorow's elegant phrase: "Digital rights management always converges on malware."
1. Are DRM protections actually adding or substracting value to a product?
NB: value in use not the same thing as market value!
DRM cause the market value of a product to be higher while value in use will be lower:
What happens is: you buy a product with DRM at a higher price; but DRM are here to put limits to the use you can make of it -> lower value in use.
How would I like this as a client/consumer/customer? Not so much.
How would I like this as a conglomerate? Probably a lot, wink wink.
2. Do DRM raise the cost of products? Do they raise the value in use (can you do more things with the product you bought)?
3. Are DRM paradoxical?
Yes, if they always raise the cost of products and never raise the value in use. Otherwise, no.
4. Cory Doctorow (@doctorow) -- boingboing -- wrote: "DRM fails completely at preventing copying, but it is brilliant at preventing innovation". Is Cory right? (oops, almost wrote: is copy right, lol)
(source of quotation:http://www.theguardian.com/technology/blog/2013/mar/12/tim-berners-lee-drm-cory-doctorow)
5. More and more products are including a software. Does this mean the end of property?
Copyrighted softwares have become the frequent case scenario, there are more and more of them, so when a consumer buys a product, he is not the owner of the software included in the product he bought. This is the case for a whole range of products, TV, car, watch...
6. Because of copyrighted softwares included in the products we buy, will we become tenants/renters/occupants instead of owners/proprietors? (end of property?) Will we rent a product instead of buying it? Is that even a problem, by the way? I'd be curious to know what people have to say here.
7. Can you give examples of DRM being beneficial or detrimental to you, in your personal or professional life?
DRM are here to protect IP (intellectual property). Of course IP is a *vast* topic...
Found it this morning, on Cory's twitter account: "Doctorow's elegant phrase: "Digital rights management always converges on malware."
"What's on the horizon for brain research"
Missed one of my favorites from the #EmTechMIT. What's on the horizon for brain research (oversimplified). pic.twitter.com/Hv2C0Os63B
— Fred (@froidianslip) September 26, 2014
Best Tweets from EmTech: Day 1 http://t.co/RIZBpFOnmz
— MIT Tech Review (@techreview) September 27, 2014
Best Tweets from EmTech: Day 2 http://t.co/5YW3jK3FyN
— MIT Tech Review (@techreview) September 27, 2014
"The Patient Will See You Now"
Excited to see the cover design of my new book @BasicBooks @TJ_Kelleher Will discuss this topic @health2con tomorrow pic.twitter.com/Xzq9cxgTuk
— Eric Topol (@EricTopol) September 22, 2014
"Homo Sapiens is a profit-driven species"
"Personnellement je pense que la génomique pourrait à terme réduire le marché de la médecine réparatrice ... et cela ne doit pas plaire à certains ... il faut toujours essayer de comprendre pourquoi les gens disent ce qu'ils disent ... sachant que l'Homo Sapiens est guidé par son intérêt ..."
"My personal opinion is that genomic precision medicine will eventually disrupt replacement medicine... Now some people will embrace the change, some others won't, depending on where their interest lies. Homo Sapiens is a profit-driven species."
"My personal opinion is that genomic precision medicine will eventually disrupt replacement medicine... Now some people will embrace the change, some others won't, depending on where their interest lies. Homo Sapiens is a profit-driven species."
 |
| Jean-Michel Billaut, a French start-up validator. |
"My personal opinion is that #genomic #precisionmedicine will eventually disrupt replacement medicine."@Billaut 1/2 pic.twitter.com/u8ZGSo6P8h
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 25, 2014
"Not everybody will embrace the change, dep. on where their interest lies.Homo Sapiens is profit-driven" @Billaut 2/2 pic.twitter.com/kfXhzgvVFs
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 25, 2014
"Stanford researchers create 'evolved' protein that may stop cancer from spreading"
Stanford researchers create 'evolved' protein that may stop cancer from spreading http://t.co/28pqjOfYYT
— Berci Meskó, MD, PhD (@Berci) September 24, 2014
"Our ability to digitize human beings"
A cool cover: our ability to digitize human beings #indivmed http://t.co/ZzwPeqsroB pic.twitter.com/KCPj7y9mQs
— Eric Topol (@EricTopol) September 24, 2014
Doing Cancer Research In Your Kitchen
.@medialab's @Joi uses @Synbiota citizen scientist kit to do cancer research in his kitchen #ScienceHack http://t.co/yc5tHWF0fr
— MITx biology (@MITxBio) September 23, 2014
"Driving Backwards" by Jessica Lander
Alzheimer. A writer is "Driving Backwards:" an attempt to retain the words, the world, with millimetric precision. Well done @jessica_lander
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 24, 2014
 |
| http://jessicalander.com |
"Undermining Science"
Totally @bennydiego: Undermining #science | #NeildeGrasTyson #UniteBlue #tcot pic.twitter.com/xAxIJ0c9jE
— madhusree singh MD (@thinkalot) September 24, 2014
"Fixing DNA is like using Microsoft Word: Find & Replace"
Fixing DNA is like using Microsoft Word: Find & Replace. The whole 'blue screen of death' takes on new meaning. #EmTechMIT
— Fred (@froidianslip) September 23, 2014
.@drjohnm @EricTopol "Doctors wanted to extend life. Instead they extended death" (Vox). Good catch. Naming the elephant in the room. #CDoM
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 24, 2014
As a physician-writer, you are a steward. Do good, not harm. Dr Emanuel’s death wish harms rather than helps. http://t.co/D3FvxBJpoz
— John Mandrola, MD (@drjohnm) September 23, 2014
"CRACKING THE FLOURISHING CODE"
TY @jogebauer 4 fascinating new book! Kindle version coming soon? #ebooks CRACKING THE FLOURISHING CODE @techreview pic.twitter.com/YtlngIXOZv
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 24, 2014
"3-D printing human organs is a long-range moonshot goal. 18 people die every day in U.S. waiting for an organ"
Fascinating talk on cellular-level 3D printing at #EmTechMIT. Perhaps the most mind-blowing talk of the day.
— More_Miscellany (@More_Miscellany) September 23, 2014
Jennifer Lewis: 3-D printing human organs is a long-range moonshot goal.
18 people die every day in U.S. waiting for an organ.
#EmTechMIT
— MIT Tech Review (@techreview) September 23, 2014
Jennifer Lewis and the Harvard 3D printing lab are printing vascularized 3D tissues. #wow #EmTechMIT pic.twitter.com/aOPz7YkIyM
— Kristine R. (@kmr2063) September 23, 2014
Jennifer Lewis' micro-3D printing talk is amazing. Awesome applications including micro scale LiON batteries and living tissue #EmTech2014
— Jim Stogdill (@jstogdill) September 23, 2014"GUBS a Language for Synthetic Biology"
 |
| http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-08123-6_4 |
"GUBS a Language for Synthetic Biology" by Adrien Basso-Blandin &
Franck Delaplace @SpringerPlus http://t.co/6qtA8b17xa #synbio @lapaillasse
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 23, 2014
A programming language that is 100% specific 2 the genome?#python isn't. Maybe GUBS is?http://t.co/6qtA8b17xa #ASHG14 pic.twitter.com/DlI9j2x3zb
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 23, 2014
Feng Zhang: wealth of genome editing info & resources available at http://t.co/lfgS3iUyzq via @lalit_kartule #ASHG14 pic.twitter.com/L7dj6zYhJH
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 23, 2014
"Last month, a team led at the University of Washington announced
they had devised and successfully tested a programming language that
can guide the assembly of synthetic DNA molecules into a circuit that
can perform a task, just as a software developer would write code to send commands to a computer.Chemists have always used mathematical models to study how molecules behave in mixtures. “Instead of thinking of this as a descriptive language that allows you to understand the chemistry, we said, we’re going to create a prescriptive language that allows you to program something,” says Georg Seelig, an assistant professor of electrical engineering and computer science at the school.
While there’s no killer app anywhere near ready yet, possible future uses for being able to design and assemble DNA to perform a specified function are wide-ranging. Seelig imagines programming molecules to act as embedded sensors inside cells that could respond to changing conditions, just as internal electronics guide the operation of automobiles or home appliances. For example, he says DNA systems could be instructed to release a drug every certain number of hours or in response to an abnormality detected in a cell. “Cells do things like that all the time. They sense their environment, they respond to it,” he notes.
In a paper published in Nature Nanotechnology, the researchers describe a basic experiment they used to test their theoretical work. They mixed two types of DNA strands (“A” and “C”) in a test tube. If there were more A than C, the system was instructed to convert all of C into A. If there were more C than A, all of the A type would become C.
A lot of work remains, but the broader field of synthetic biology is growing. “It’s nice and well to do this computation in test tubes, but really where this kind of implementation is useful is when you want to control cell behavior.” Article by JESSICA LEBER
Source.
"Peter Thiel's Uncomplementary Views of Big Pharma"
Agree! RT @cathcoste: Peter Thiel's Uncomplementary Views of Big Pharma via @Dereklowe http://t.co/e6DAUOiZ42 pic.twitter.com/dfURQ9lZ9n
— Robert West PhD (@westr) September 23, 2014
"We are on the verge of a cancer, data + genomic revolution"
  |
| http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/09/15/transformation-3 |
We are on the verge of a cancer, data + genomic revolution... The Transformation http://t.co/xKoMJo3wjS @newyorker
— Adam Goulburn (@AGoulburn) September 22, 2014
"The Patient Will See You Now": Eric Topol MD's New Book
Excited to see the cover design of my new book @BasicBooks @TJ_Kelleher Will discuss this topic @health2con tomorrow pic.twitter.com/Xzq9cxgTuk
— Eric Topol (@EricTopol) September 22, 2014
"Doctors wanted to extend life. Instead they extended death"
Highly interesting piece: "Doctors wanted to extend life. Instead they extended death." http://t.co/ALd0xrt4CI #bioethics #DeathWithDignity
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 21, 2014
"Faites sauter la banque"
Mercredi prochain, sortie de mon nouveau livre "Faites sauter la banque" aux @EditionsStock pic.twitter.com/FeqoQnKHWx
— Marc Fiorentino (@marcfiorentino) September 19, 2014
"How DARPA's artificial spleen tech works & why it matters"
Detailed description from @Gizmag & @DavidSzondy of how @DARPA's artificial spleen tech works & why it matters. http://t.co/F5iEt8BnDQ
— DARPA (@DARPA) September 19, 2014
"Homologous Hope": showing DNA repair of BRCA2
Wanna get people talking about #BRCA? Check this out. "Homologous Hope" - shows DNA repair of BRCA2 @penncancer #hope pic.twitter.com/TUsZwLdd0o
— Stacey Sager (@staceysager7) March 13, 2014
"There should be a Nobel prize for social media"
There should be a Nobel prize for social media. #Kawaselfie pic.twitter.com/JyXJ8avKBO
— Guy Kawasaki (@GuyKawasaki) September 18, 2014
.@NobelPrize for #socialmedia: @GuyKawasaki & Nobel for #patientengagement: @ReginaHolliday #TheWalkingGallery #CDoM pic.twitter.com/FqzEoApHoM
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 19, 2014
"$1 million prize incentive to create an artificial liver!"
Competing teams announced for $1 million prize incentive 2 create an artificial liver: KurzweilAI http://t.co/GJZPHgqkev via @kurzweilainews
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 18, 2014
Using MinION sequencing machine, sitting at my kitchen table...
... like so:
Boot camp not withstanding, home sequencing is quite cool. Old-fashioned in glass. @nanopore pic.twitter.com/GINg3nexcE
— Nick Loman (@pathogenomenick) June 23, 2014
"One scientist this month tweeted a picture of the sequencer on his dining room table, decoding DNA."
Radical New DNA Sequencer Finally Gets into Researchers’ Hands http://t.co/ZVP5B8cgyf
— MIT Tech Review (@techreview) September 18, 2014
Having your genome sequenced at your own request or initiative is forbidden by law in France. L.O.L.
 |
"David Deamer made this sketch in 1989 when the idea for nanopore sequencing came to him. One day in 1989, biophysicist David Deamer pulled his car off California’s Interstate 5 to hurriedly scribble down an idea. In a mental flash, he had pictured a strand of DNA threading its way through a microscopic pore. Grabbing a pen and a yellow pad, he sketched out a radical new way to study the molecule of life. Twenty-five years later, the idea is now being commercialized as a gene sequencing machine that’s no larger than a smartphone, and whose effects might eventually be similarly transformative." Source.
|
L'Agence de la biomédecine interdit au citoyen de faire séquencer son génome et nationalise ses organes. Cf Banksy ;) pic.twitter.com/L5WTomIqVW
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 21, 2014
French Agency of Biomedicine says requesting your genome sequencing is illegal but consent to organ donation written in French law. Biased.
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 21, 2014
L'agence de la biomédecine interdit au citoyen de faire séquencer son génome mais le consentement au don de nos organes inscrit dans la loi.
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 21, 2014
La loi interdit 2 faire séquencer son génome en FRA ->je le fais moi-même,à ma table 2 cuisine http://t.co/Ewgrt9dz7T pic.twitter.com/PJTnhSLzS0
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 21, 2014
Eric Lander PhD: "The Secrets of The Human Genome"
Eric Lander wonderfully explains Secrets of Human Genome in 30 minutes #breakthroughprize symposium. http://t.co/pGPxFvhsQg @broadinstitute
— Breakthrough Prize (@brkthroughprize) May 19, 2014
RNAi, Cancer Treatment and Genomic Precision Medicine
RNAi, cancer treatment and #genomic #PrecisionMedicine http://t.co/PUeR8U8PiB via @techreview #ASHG14 #CDoM pic.twitter.com/6lecAAyatF
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 17, 2014
Medicine 2064 with Daniel Kraft MD
. @vkhosla on Implications of Wearables: 10k vital sign data points from your wrist will re-write medical textbooks pic.twitter.com/81Y5Yqx86O
— Daniel Kraft, MD (@daniel_kraft) September 16, 2014
Artificial spleen that could clean blood of future sepsis patients
Video from @WyssInstitute describes "artificial spleen" that could clean blood of future sepsis patients http://t.co/Ce7X9MUaX2 #SAM2014
— DARPA (@DARPA) September 15, 2014
American Society of Human Genetics Conference 2014 (Oct, San Diego CA)
Will attend #ASHG14 conference in San Diego CA Oct. 18-22 #genomics #synbio #python #rstats #CDoM #excited http://t.co/kbfSFIbMDX
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 15, 2014
The science of sharing science http://t.co/CKnUY67id5 Note how health, life science, and genetics fare @PNASNews pic.twitter.com/21Xmk0RiTV
— Eric Topol (@EricTopol) September 15, 2014
Barriers to adoption of #mHealth for doctors and patients http://t.co/ei6JwJyurX @SCIRP #OA #CDoM pic.twitter.com/13LIGhHaOI
— Eric Topol (@EricTopol) September 16, 2014
Evolution of the digitized human being
 |
| Banksy |
Evolution of the digitized human being by @therealbansky via @EvanMuse :-) pic.twitter.com/IS1n9RChGB
— Eric Topol (@EricTopol) September 16, 2014
Evolution of the digitized human being: Banksy #HomoPossessus #DTC #genomics #ASHG14 http://t.co/zPpkumIQHP @EvanMuse pic.twitter.com/s3DL27zx4O
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 16, 2014
Here's How I've started Learning Quantitative Medicine
 |
| The future of medicine will involve computer programming, big data and genomics. How will the stethoscopes and microscopes of tomorrow look like? The answer lies in your genome, as well as programming languages like Python, or cool "quantitative biology" instruments like MATLAB and R. Ever heard of that (very cool!) genome editing tool called CRISPR? |
"Intro to systems biology" on Coursera (Mount Sinai) seems very promising, too... 7.00x and 7.QBWx (MIT&edX) were both excellent, great pedagogy & content in 7.00x, fascinating content in 7.QBWx but difficult because no tutorials in python.
"I took an edX course from Georgetown: Genomic Medicine Gets Personal and they talked about how system biologists would play a great role for handling the big data.
I was curious, so I surfed google and found that course from Coursera ["Intro to systems biology"]. So far the course is very interesting and I might decide to take all of the course series for specialization... But still, the quantitative part is challenging! Not as challenging as MIT's quantitative biology workshop 7.QBWx, but still...
I took lots of courses about quantitative bio and its computational tools. I want to go to grad school and still try to find out whether quantitative bio is right for me or not... I wish I could do well... "
3 #MOOCS I will be taking: http://t.co/ACCXO3YLU7 http://t.co/ZiwtEJMydP http://t.co/2mRtykuaFW #genomics #R #python pic.twitter.com/GJdIDXLExd
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 6, 2014
Completing @mitx6001x #mitx6001x #python #MOOC is not my goal *right now*, as it is not focused on #genomics. Still reviewing #7QBWx course.
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 6, 2014
I just registered for Explore Statistics with R - join me on @edxonline #mooc https://t.co/weZ6U6iGPW
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 6, 2014
I signed up for Programming for Everybody (Python) from @umich on @Coursera! https://t.co/N39aphysym
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 6, 2014
I signed up for Ethical and Social Challenges of Genomic and Precision Medicine on @Coursera! https://t.co/N0cJX1gihL
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 6, 2014
Atul Gawande's New Book: "Being Mortal"
Being Mortal @Atul_Gawande @ProfileBooks the realities of aging and dying as seen by a surgeon, on #SJPrize longlist pic.twitter.com/4B1xphz34F
— Samuel Johnson Prize (@SJPrize) September 2, 2014
MIT Hacking Medicine
Do you know @mithackmed, @PrDavidKhayat? MIT working on how 2 disrupt medicine/healthcare system. Any ideas? #CDoM #cancer #genomics #python
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 14, 2014
Wanna make the world a better place? Best way to do it: start learning computer coding, here's how
Entendu hier à une réunion d'étudiants MIT-Harvard Med school (Boston): "Ceux qui ne sauront pas programmer (langage de programmation informatique : écrire du code) dans le monde d'aujourd'hui et à venir seront comme les analphabètes du monde d'hier." Par "analphabètes", ils entendent : prolétaires. Il se pourrait bien qu'ils aient raison...
How can we make the world a better place? First step: start learning computer coding! Here's how: #MOOC #cs50 #cs50x http://t.co/bs2s6QpveO
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 12, 2014
"(near)-universal screening is the only way we’ll nail pathogenicity prediction."
.@dgmacarthur Agree; it's the future, and not just for BRCA.....we'll get there someday. It won't be called a "database" but that's OK.
— Eric Topol (@EricTopol) September 10, 2014
MIT Engineer: "I Say Let Patients Help"
They are going to love @ePatientDave's presentation at @MITxBio :) Reminded me of @eric_lander's #700x #MOOC lectures http://t.co/LySJhucIkP
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 8, 2014
A US company is planning to produce kidney tissue on 3D printer using tech developed in Queensland via @ePatientDave pic.twitter.com/0T1GBZreXN
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 9, 2014
"Le Guide de la médecine du futur"
 |
| Trouver ce livre en version anglaise (Kindle Amazon) |
Génome,
microbiome, métabolome, késako ?? Jamais entendu parler de ces termes.
Pourtant, la médecine de demain, celle qui se prépare de par le monde,
croise deux compétences qui défient les frontières des pays : le
numérique et la biologie. L'union des deux donne naissance à la médecine
quantitative, qui d'après la NASA est "la technoloqie du 21ème siècle".
Récemment diplômée du MIT en Génétique & Big Data et de la Sorbonne
en sciences humaines, je suis passionnée par ce projet : expliquer la
science au grand public. Suivez-moi sur Twitter:@cathcoste.
For the first time medical educators are facing digital natives
"For the first time medical educators are facing digital natives" -@Doctor_V #MedX
— Stanford Medicine X (@StanfordMedX) September 6, 2014
Ludicrous to tell a pt in a gown that our job is to protect his privacy @fredtrotter #MedX #HIPAA #Healthcare #data pic.twitter.com/iQYBXM1CGD
— Hugo Campos (@HugoOC) September 6, 20143D Printers with DNA Lasers
@elonmusk said space, sustainable power, internet. I say quantum computing and DNA laser printing. #CambrianGenomics @TWistartups +1
— Kevin Curtin (@elementko1) September 2, 2014
Austen Heinz invented a DNA laser printer for you to create new creatures, Part 1 - YouTube http://t.co/0ewiP0EYAI
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 6, 2014
Part 2 http://t.co/dYCE5NY4sT
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 6, 2014
@Peterdiamandis @Jackandraka Checkout Austen Heinz discuss 3D Printers with DNA Lasers with @Jason on @Twist http://t.co/j0DuIKEtrm
— Paisano (@Paisano) September 4, 2014
"E-Nable. Making prosthetic hands by 3D printing. Posting a map on www of people with printers volunteering to print"
#enablingthefuture #prosthetics #MedX pic.twitter.com/KrOJdSXtyL
— Karen Anaid Solis (@karenasolis) September 5, 2014E-Nable. Making prosthetic hands by 3D printing. Posting a map on www of people with printers volunteering to print. #MedX @clinicalinnovat
— aNNaThies (@aNNaThies) September 5, 2014Biology Is Quantitative
Your genome represents 3 Gigabytes of data 3 billion letters DNA 25,000 genes related to 10,000 diseases, w/ 16 million of gene markers #DNA
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 5, 2014
"Genomic Entertainment"
5 billion in R&D for a new drug. 95% fail to be safe & effective. Sustainable business? http://t.co/THMOIPvSmn pic.twitter.com/jBxSf8S3WY
— Kim Goodsell (@digitalpatient_) August 22, 2014
The MOOCs that will guide you to the future of medicine
 |
| Genomics + python coding language will work wonders in genomic "precision" medicine; I am currently involved in both MOOCs: MITx6001x (computer sciences and python coding) & "precision medicine." Already earned myself MITx edX certs (digital diplomas) in genomics and quantitative biology workshop -- 7.00x & 7.QBWx Instructor in both MOOCs: Eric Lander PhD. |
"Your Inner Fish"
I must have been living under a rock. Just watched the coolest thing ever - Your Inner Fish: http://t.co/hJfwaUTWiO
— cristina (@cristin_adriana) August 31, 2014
Your Inner Fish nominated in 7 (seven) categories for Jackson Hole Science Media Awards! http://t.co/Nqz47eifcm @JHwildlifefilm @NeilShubin
— Alex Tate (@TatoDocs) September 3, 2014
Top 100 Kindles including "The Guide to the Future of Medicine: Technology AND The Human Touch" FREE Kindle until Saturday
The Guide to the Future of Medicine is in The Top 100 Kindles on Amazon! http://t.co/iXW4FaMRSx
— Berci Meskó, MD, PhD (@Berci) September 3, 2014
My review of the book on Amazon:
Thanks @Berci Mesko 4 gr8 book! #CDoM #MedX @ReginaHolliday @StanfordMedX @Billaut @EricTopol @SusannahFox @edyong209 pic.twitter.com/9AZNgPSjoL
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) September 4, 2014
"Battery-less device powers a pacemaker using heartbeats"
Battery-less device powers a pacemaker using heartbeats http://t.co/VK5q336z0n #DigitalHealth #WearableTech #mHealth pic.twitter.com/EMfSjNgwzk
— Paul Sonnier (@Paul_Sonnier) September 3, 2014
The Future of Medicine in One Word Cloud
The Future of Medicine in One Word Cloud http://t.co/Uftz9dD9IA #medicalfuture pic.twitter.com/uEF6tuPkMm
— Berci Meskó, MD, PhD (@Berci) September 1, 2014
The World In 3013 (fiction)
These 14 micro-essays I wrote (FR) w/@cp92isa for @Billaut got the attention of my MIT profs.Preparing UK version now http://t.co/uK6toNbKeR
— CATHERINE COSTE (@cathcoste) August 6, 2014
 |
| "Cliffhanger" French Version |
Inscription à :
Articles (Atom)
Articles
