I’ll be following @ewanbirney et al’s foray into drug target validation with great interest: http://t.co/XMpDPCElLC
— Daniel MacArthur (@dgmacarthur) March 27, 2014
http://genomeinformatician.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/big-data-genetics-and-translation.html |
"Drugs act on these targets. Drugs are often
small molecules and sometimes proteins, like antibodies, that will change the
activity of a biological target. A drug has to be able to enter the body, do
what it was designed to do and not mess around doing other things. Pharmaceutical
companies are really good at making these.
Clinical trials
involve giving a new (or repurposed) drug to a group of consenting people. They
are jaw-droppingly expensive. Unfortunately, the vast majority (90%) of drugs
ultimately fail to make it through clinical trials. A large proportion of those
fail because the information on which they were based, from right at the start – the target protein– was
not quite right.
What’s the
problem? In short, it is that a billion-dollar phase III clinical trial is a
very expensive way to discover that your drug wasn't changing the right target."
How do you make it better?
"Clearly,
validating those biological targets is extremely important and it can be done a
lot better. What the CTTV is aiming to do is change the landscape for the initial
phase of drug discovery by pooling our knowledge and resources to improve
target validation.
GSK realised
that this is not something that they (or any other commercial organisation) can
do easily in house. Wisely, they decided that this work is best carried out
pre-competitively, in the public domain. Around a year ago, members of GSK’s
senior leadership came to visit the Genome Campus to explore a way forward, and
the CTTV concept was born."(...)
"At what point can one say, definitively, that this protein is a good target for a drug to act on to change the course of a disease?
To
resolve this you would ideally create a specific perturbation that changes a specific
molecule, verify its safety in humans and give it to people with the disease. In
short, develop a drug. But the CTTV aims to get a good handle on target
validation without actually making drugs, so what information are we working
with, and what are we hoping to deliver?"
http://genomeinformatician.blogspot.co.uk/2014/03/big-data-genetics-and-translation.html |
"Not
to get too geeky, but I’m
particularly excited about the CRISPR/Cas9 technology (like most
experimentalists) because they make it possible to introduce specific
mutations into
cell lines. This should be particularly powerful in oncology, where
systematic
cancer sequencing efforts are giving rise to a number of robust targets.
Cancer has been transformed by the ability to more systematically find
oncogenes and tumour supressors via sequencing, leading to targeted
therapies such as BRAF inhibitors. The question is:
which ones in a now established cancer cell do you need to target to slow (or stop) its growth?"
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire